Industrial Strength Succession Planning
Raise your hand if you are the owner of a successful family business and you want your kids to step into your shoes someday. First, let鈥檚 be specific about the word 鈥渒ids.
Share





Raise your hand if you are the owner of a successful family business and you want your kids to step into your shoes someday. First, let鈥檚 be specific about the word 鈥渒ids.鈥 We mean only those kids who are now in the business and who will someday run the business. We believe that kids who are not in the business should not share ownership with the business kids. Of course, the non-business kids will receive other assets, usually of equal value to the amount (value of the business) received by the business kids.
Although the situation described in the above paragraph comes up often, we have rarely seen a solution to the 鈥渉ow to transfer the business to the business kids and treat the nonbusiness kids fairly鈥 problem. The rest of this article will describe our step-by-step solution.
We have nicknamed the process 鈥淚ndustrial Strength Succession Planning鈥 because when the transaction is properly done, it holds together and successfully survives the test of time. Interestingly, when there is a problem, it is never caused by the plan鈥檚 technical aspects (the tax law and legal documents). Rather, it鈥檚 those human beings with different agendas and opinions who make up normal American families. Rarely鈥攙ery rarely鈥攁re problems caused by the immediate family. Who creates the friction? Typically it鈥檚 a brother-in-law or sister-in-law married to a nonbusiness child who owns a piece of the business.
Let鈥檚 take a look at a real-life example, where the roof鈥攂ecause of family squabbling鈥攁lmost caved in on a highly successful family business (Success Co., owned by dad, Joe). Joe owned 52 percent of Success Co.鈥檚 stock and his four adult children owned 48 percent (12 percent each). Three of the kids (Sam, Sol and Sue) work full-time for Success Co. The fourth kid (Ray) is a successful professional and has no interest in the business.
Sue had a baby and told the family she would not return to work until her daughter went to college. The squabbling started with Joe and the remaining business kids, Sam and Sol, on one side and Sue, her husband (Roy) and Ray鈥檚 wife (Roz) on the other.
Although the successful business struggled in the early years, it had always been a source of pleasure for Joe and Mary. Lately, it had become a thorn in their sides. First, we pinned down their specific goals for the business and all of their children: (1) stop the business bickering; (2) treat the kids equally (after much discussion, 鈥渆qually鈥 was redefined to mean the business to the business kids and other assets of equal value to the non-business kids); and (3) transfer Success Co., in a tax-effective manner, to the business kids, but allow Joe to maintain control for as long as he lives.
My advice, really my insistence, was that only business kids own stock of Success Co. Here鈥檚 the plan we implemented:
- Success Co. was recapitalized (100 shares of voting stock and 10,000 shares of nonvoting stock). Every one of the shareholders got their proportionate share (that is, Joe got 52 voting shares and 5,200 nonvoting shares).
- Success Co. was professionally appraised with a specific fair market value (FMV) per voting share and nonvoting share.
- Success Co. redeemed (bought) all of the shares鈥攙oting and non voting鈥攐wned by the non-business kids (Sue and Ray) for their fair market value. Note: At that point Joe owned 68 percent of Success Co., while Sam and Sol each owned 16 percent (rounded) of the stock.
- We used an intentionally defective trust (IDT) to transfer鈥攖ax free鈥攖he nonvoting shares (5,200) to Sam and Sol (2,600 shares each). The IDT saved Joe and his two sons about $2.7 million in income and capital gains taxes. Because the nonvoting shares, which contained about 99 percent of the FMV of Success Co., were no longer owned by Joe, the shares were out of his estate for estate tax purposes. Sam and Sol will receive the voting shares (half each) when Joe goes to the big business in the sky.
As readers of this column know, solving just a portion of a client鈥檚 estate tax problem is not our style. Always, but always, the comprehensive plan includes a complete lifetime plan (here, the succession plan was a part of the lifetime plan) and a complete estate plan that dovetails with the life plan. The overall plan for Joe and Mary is built around two basic concepts: (1) the ability to maintain their lifestyle for as long as they live; and (2) an estate plan that will pass all of their wealth鈥攅very dime of it鈥攖o their kids, instead of losing it to the IRS.
Related Content
Same Headcount, Double the Sales: Successful Job Shop Automation
Doubling sales requires more than just robots. Pro Products’ staff works in tandem with robots, performing inspection and other value-added activities.
Read MoreHow I Made It: Nushrat Ahmed: CNC Swiss Operator
By day, 21-year-old Nushrat Ahmed is a CNC Swiss operator making automotive parts. By night, she handcrafts crocheted items.
Read MoreFinding Skilled Labor Through Partnerships and Benefits
To combat the skilled labor shortage, this Top Shops honoree turned to partnerships and unique benefits to attract talented workers.
Read MoreInside Machineosaurus: Unique Job Shop with Dinosaur-Named CNC Machines, Four-Day Workweek & High-Precision Machining
Take a tour of Machineosaurus, a Massachusetts machine shop where every CNC machine is named after a dinosaur!
Read MoreRead Next
AMRs Are Moving Into Manufacturing: 4 Considerations for Implementation
AMRs can provide a flexible, easy-to-use automation platform so long as manufacturers choose a suitable task and prepare their facilities.
Read MoreMachine Shop MBA
Making Chips and 高赔率六合彩 are teaming up for a new podcast series called Machine Shop MBA—designed to help manufacturers measure their success against the industry’s best. Through the lens of the Top Shops benchmarking program, the series explores the KPIs that set high-performing shops apart, from machine utilization and first-pass yield to employee engagement and revenue per employee.
Read More